How to show empathy as a coach: The effects of coaches’ imagine-self versus imagine-other empathy on the client’s self-change and coaching outcome

Researcher/Institution name:: פרטי החוקר/ים ומוסד המחקר Sandra J. Diller, Christina Mühlberger, Nele Löhlau, Eva Jonas - Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Austria; Organizational Psychology, Private University Schloss Seeburg, Austria.

Research Summary

Abstract

This study investigated the difference between coaches’ imagine-self (IS) and imagine-other (IO) empathy. In a survey study (N=242), it was found that coaches who perceived the client’s self-change as more important valued IO empathy more highly. In an experimental study (N=57), the authors manipulated coaches’ empathy strategies. The results revealed a positive effect of IO empathy (but not IS) on clients’ self-change and coaching satisfaction. The main implication is that coaches should prioritize IO empathy—focusing on the client’s perspective—over IS empathy, which involves projecting one’s own experiences.

 

Research Question

Does the coach’s use of imagine-self (IS) versus imagine-other (IO) empathy differentially impact client self-change and coaching satisfaction?

 

Relevance to Coaching

The research provides practical guidelines for coaching behavior, suggesting that active paraphrasing and a strict focus on the client’s internal world (rather than the coach’s own history) are crucial for coaching effectiveness.

 

Significance and Innovation

The study uniquely distinguishes between two types of cognitive empathy in a coaching context, providing empirical evidence that “imagine-other” (IO) is the superior strategy for supporting client self-change. It highlights the potential for training coaches specifically in perspective-taking skills.

 

Method and Data

The research utilized a two-study design:

A survey of 242 coaches examining their perceptions of empathy and self-change.

An experimental study with 57 clients, randomly assigned to receive coaching characterized by either IS or IO empathy, evaluated via pre- and post-coaching questionnaires.

 

Main Findings

Coaches who prioritize self-change in their clients report higher use of IO empathy. Clients who experienced IO-based empathy from their coaches reported significantly higher coaching satisfaction and experienced more positive self-change outcomes compared to those who experienced IS-based empathy.

APA:

Diller, S. J., Mühlberger, C., Löhlau, N., & Jonas, E. (2023). How to show empathy as a coach: The effects of coaches’ imagine-self versus imagine-other empathy on the client’s self-change and coaching outcome. Current Psychology, 42(14), 11917-11935.

Website:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-021-02430-y

Additional Studies

Are AI Coaching Agents Learning Friend or Foe?: A Qualitative Study of Learning and Development Leaders’ Perceptions

Coaching and its effectiveness in organizations: Reflecting on a decade of research, looking forward to future challenges

Annie Van Damme, Dordt University, Department of Education, Master of Education Thesis

Teacher Perceptions on the Effectiveness of Instructional Coaching

Melinda Glowacki, supervisor of secondary teacher candidates at the University of California, Irvine, and a member of the International Coaching Federation